casnu la .uikipedi'as.:veltu'i tadji lo nu fanva lo cmene: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
question |
.ie |
||
Linji 22
:Good idea, that makes it much easier. What about diacritics? Some (e.g. acute, grave, circumflex) should cause no problems but should more exotic letters (like ă in Bălgariya) be used in article titles and normal text references? --[[User:Danogo|Danogo]] 17:57, 5 May 2007 (UTC)
::I agree that that's a problem. This has actually be an extremely long-running dispute on the English Wikipedia (English uses basically the same alphabet as Lojban does, plus a couple letters). I tentatively agree with including common diacritics such as acute, grave, circumflex, diaresis, and macron. Some others are probably okay, but a line probably ought to be drawn somewhere. Let's everybody keep in mind that this convention is probably going to be a temporary expedient, so we need not worry too much about getting everything exactly right.—[[User:Sen|sen]] <sup>([[User_talk:Sen|ko tavla]])</sup> 21:41, 5 May 2007 (UTC)
| |||