casnu:liste loi gugde: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added
.emuzest. (casnu | selstika)
Danogo (casnu | selstika)
Linji 53
 
I want to pick up this discussion again as it has seemed to dwindle out and nothing has been done with the issue. I don't agree with those changes that were made, and have a feeling that many others here felt uncomfortable as well. I feel that using lujvo for country names is arbitrary in the way that it is used several places at the moment. Examples are listed above. I consider it more purist either. I know the grammatical legality of using brivla behind {la} and using it as a normal name, but I think a cmevla would be better in most instances. Jbovlaste should be the leading star in this matter, and it is true that it does not contain many country names. But that doesn't help when jbovlaste isn't checked before changes are made. Norway has had its entry in jbovlaste (under {[http://www.lojban.org/cgi-bin/dict.pl?Form=dict.pl1&Query=noreg&Strategy=*&Database=en%3C-%3Ejbo&submit=Submit+query noreg.]}) before I began studying lojban, and thus before the changes was made. --mi'e [[User:.emuzest.|.emuzest.]] 09:10, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
 
:I totally agree. In the meantime, there has been [[Wikipedia:veltu'i tadji lo nu fanva lo cmene|a proposal]] to use la'o zoi ... zoi in article names until a naming standard has been established. However, I'm not sure whether that proposal should apply to names that already exist in jbovlaste, like noreg. --[[User:Danogo|Danogo]] 05:54, 27 May 2007 (UTC)
Return to "liste loi gugde" page.